pokerstars w$ Sell Pokerstars W$ for 91% or buy W$ for 97.5%. Pokerstars W$ are gained by winning satellites to the WCOOP, EPT, APPT, LAPT and the WSOP.
Sell Pokerstars W$
pokerstars t$ Sell Pokerstars T$ for 97% or buy T$ for 99.7%. Pokerstars T$ are gained buy winning satellites to the weekly and daily Pokerstars tournaments.
Sell Pokerstars T$
Trade Pokerstars W$ Use our trade calculator to find out how much your tournament dollars are worth or to find out how much you can save by buying tournament dollars.
Trade Pokerstars W$ T$
pokerstars Checkout the Official PokerStars Blog for the latest Pokerstars news.

 

pokerstars blog

Archive for July, 2009


Alex Gomes reflects on WPT win

Friday, July 31st, 2009

teampro-thumb.JPGAfter one of the Team PokerStars Pros has a big win, we like to give them a chance to tell us what it was like. Even though he is the newest WPT millionaire, Brazilian Pro Alex Gomes took the time to sit down and tell us what it was like to add a WPT title to his list of wins. Congrats again, Alex, and thanks for taking the time to take us where few have been.


by Alex Gomes

After a long and exausting time in Vegas, where I spent almost 70 days dedicated WSOP tournaments, I had decided not to play at the Bellagio. But I'm a poker lover, and despite being tired and a little bit upset about my results at the WSOP, I decided to play at the event after talking with some friends.

It was really a last minute decision. I arrived at the Bellagio at 3:30pm (the tournament started at noon), with blinds 100 / 200 at the third level. That said, this is a really deepstack tournament. Everyone started with 60.000 chips and 90 minute levels, so my late arrival was not a problem.

This is one of the best structures in poker tournaments. It's a very long event, with six days of play and a maximum of six levels per day. So, we started playing at noon, and at 8:30pm the day ended. This is very good for players, because we can have a good meal and a nice night of sleep.

But, on the other side, the WPT has one of the toughest fields around, with a lot of well-known professionals. On my first day, I started at a very tough table, with Nenad Medic, Justin Smith, Jon Turner and some internet pros. The table had a lot of action early on, but I didn't have much success. I finished the day with 39.400 chips with the average sitting around 80,000.

alex-gomes-wpt.jpg

On Day 2, I was seated between Michael Mizrachi and "gboro", the famous online player. Freedy Deeb was at the table, too. My game finally started to kick in and I ran my stack up to 223,000, well above the 160,000 average. That gave me a lot of motivation to came back next day.

My Day 3 had a lot of ups and downs. I started at a table with my friend from Team PokerStars Pro, Humberto Brenes, and with Kevin Saul, the same man who was at the
final table with me at the PokerStars Caribbean Adventure early this year.

After three levels, my stack was really growing and was up to around 350,000. That's when I had to change tables. I ended up sitting with Jonathan Little and some online kids. I got crippled by Little when there were only 50 players left, all-in pre-flop with a pair of eights against pocket queens. I played the hand badly, and was left with only 60,000. At the time, the average was around 400,000. I somehow managed to double up two times in a row, and by the end of the day I had a short stack of 222,000.

Day 4 started with only 31 players. We needed to lose four players to bust the money bubble. I decided to take advantage of that, and it worked. I played very aggressively (the way I like!) and got up to a 420,000 stack. From that point on, I played the best poker of my career. I finished the day with 1,700.000 with the average around 1,500,000.

Day 5 was the fastest in WPT history. With only 10 players left, we only had to achieve four eliminations before we hit the televised final table. And that happened pretty fast! The short stack busted on the very first hand. It took just an hour and half to get down to six players. Suddenly, I was at a WPT final table. I was the short stack, but had 1,500,000 with blinds at 10,000 / 20,000, more than enough to play fast and loose!

This table was considered by many (Erik Seidel included) to be one of the toughest in WPT history. That was a huge motivator for me. Thank God I kept playing really well. I played loose with no fear of making mistakes and no fear of the other players. With that mentality and disposition, I worked my way up to chip leader with three players remaining. Soon, I was heads up and confident.

It was not easy. I won some coin flips. I lost some coin flips. I lost some hands when I was a favorite, but then bluffed a lit bit and earned some nice pots. You can see all that on TV later this year!

I want to thank all the Brazilians that supported me, not only those who were at the Bellagio, but everybody who spent the night without sleep, cheering the final table on the internet. I am very proud again, to be the first Brazilian to win this very important title.


Stud: Hand strategy

Friday, July 31st, 2009

stud-thumb.jpgby Adam "STUDSTOOD" Roberts

This past year, I have been blogging on many different topics and aspects of overall poker play, including bankroll requirements (both per session and for the long term), game selection (based on limit of game, type of game- especially with regards to your own ability), money management (also both per session and long term), table persona, table demeanor, game preparedness, getting staked, cash play vs. tournament play, etc.

I feel that those, as well as other topics, were necessary to discuss prior to delving into specific hand strategy. Based on the e-mails and phone calls I've received, you have seemed to appreciate this decision, and I have appreciated your feedback, questions, suggestions and comments.

But now it's time to get ready to move on to specific hand strategy.

Since my consulting responsibilities here at PokerStars include playing in the $10/$20 and $30/$60 limit games in Stud high, Stud Hi/Lo and Razz, as well as their corresponding weekly $215 buy-in tournaments, I will try to focus my strategy specifically on those limits, and the ante structures which coincide with them.

There are many different ways to be a successful poker player. I will just try to help you along by giving you my opinions, but I want to make clear that my thoughts and recommendations are not necessarily those of anyone else at PokerStars.

There are "many different ways to skin a cat" with regards to the strategy used to play a specific hand, based on instinct and the table environment/situation (i.e., how you are doing in the game, how you are doing vs. your opponent, knowing your opponent's tendencies, etc.), plus there are the "cut and dried" mathematics of the hand, which should be learned and consistently incorporated into other aspects of your hand strategy in order to achieve long term success.

The phrase "long term success" in itself is quite ambiguous, since there is no specific number of hands, hours, days or sessions to accurately define the phrase. In a previous blog, I suggested using 2000 hours playing in a specific type of game and limit, playing against the same players, for you to try and accurately assess how much your hourly earn (or loss) will be for that particular limit and game.

The hand situation strategy I will be suggesting to you will be even more ambiguous with regards to how long it will take for accurate results to be determined for any given hand.
For instance, in Stud high, I recommend not to play a split underpair with an unrelated kicker on Third Street, in a heads-up situation when your opponent raises (or re-raises you) with a higher door card. Let's say you disagree with my assessment of that particular strategy, and decide to go against it. You may win your first few hands or even many of the hands you play, going against my recommended strategy, and you may even profit. This may go on for a substantial (also a very ambiguous word when it comes to poker) period of time. You might even come to feel that my advice is completely wrong.

One of the toughest parts of playing poker successfully is evaluating the significance of short-term experiences. Even if I am "in the ballpark" with regards to using a minimum of 2000 hours as a guideline to determine your results in a particular limit and game, how many specific hand results will you need to use along the way for you to determine whether a certain hand strategy is correct? I cannot give you a specific answer to that. All I will attempt to do here is give you the accurate mathematics for a specific hand, as well as various other opinions of how, when and why to incorporate certain other variables into your strategy.

Many software packages will give you the mathematics to a given hand at every point or "street" in that hand. Poker Probe and other similar programs give useful information on specific situations. Although I would be a fool to dispute those findings (which are mathematically sound), it's only part of the picture. There are far too many other variables to a specific hand to be able to solely use the software findings for success.
Among the variables you will need to consider are real odds (what the math is in a given hand at that time or "street"), implied odds (what the odds will be for you as the hand progresses), and pot odds (what odds the pot is offering). Although it is not always possible to predict those odds, especially implied odds, you must be able to at least be "in the ballpark" more often than not to truly understand when and why to correctly employ your hand strategy. Predicting how your opponents will act is a key poker skill that is extremely hard to master.

The key is to start thinking about hands on a higher level. While the math of a hand may dictate a certain action, how will that action affect the remainder of the hand? How will my opponents react to that action? Are there ways to get them to act incorrectly, making the hand more profitable to me?

All Stud games (Stud high, Stud Hi/Lo and Razz) have one more round of betting than flop games. All forms of Stud are also primarily played at "Limit" stakes, as opposed to various other games which are also played at "No Limit" stakes. This means that it's much less likely for the action to be completed early in the hand. These "extra" betting rounds in Stud complicate accurately assessing your implied and pot odds, because there are more potential future actions to consider.

As I have also done in previous blogs, I gave different scenarios in cash game play as opposed to tournament play. Although "real odds" (hand versus hand percentages at a given moment) do not change in those two different venues, your assessment of implied odds might change based on your opponent's different styles of play in cash games vs. tournaments, and/or his/her chip stack and/or the stage in a tournament at the time of your hand. In tournament play, you should consider these aforementioned factors prior to making your specific hand decisions.

And again, not to be redundant, it is important for you to play with the proper and comfortable bankroll in a cash game setting to enable you to make the "correct" play without fear. I have seen players unable to "pull the trigger" because they were playing on "short money" or even get "all-in" in a hand which prevented them from making the correct play. I feel that this is very important to understand and consider when choosing the table limit which is right for you.

Beginning next blog, I will begin covering specific hand strategy in Stud high, Stud Hi/Lo and Razz. Each week, I will discuss a different hand scenario, switching among those games.

In addition to hoping that you continue emailing me with your ideas, questions, and suggestions, feel free to present me with your own hand scenario and if it's appropriate I will discuss it in a future blog.

Until next time, you can find me in the $10/$20 and $30/$60 limit games in our Stud section, as well as in our weekend $215 buy-in tournaments for Stud games. Please check the starting times of each of those events under Tourney > Special in the PokerStars lobby.

Feel free to contact me with any questions, suggestions or thoughts at adamr@pokerstars.com.

See you at the tables!


PokerStars IPT Venice off to a flyer

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Venice is a tourist magnet, packed with folks snaking their way through the city's winding streets or gliding gracefully along the waterways on a river taxi to see one of countless historical attractions. So when PokerStars revealed this would be the second stop of its Italian Poker Tour, everyone expected a reasonable turn out.

But no one expected this - 218 players showed up to play Day 1A yesterday, with even more bound to turn up for today's 1B. Such was the interest, they queued from the reception desk, down the hall and out in to the street and the Italian sunshine as they waited patiently to part with the €2,000 + 200 required to take a place around the felt.

Of that impressive number, 45 played yesterday for much less having qualified on PokerStars.

They had the chance to not only take a shot at a big event, but to do so against some of the game's biggest names. Team PokerStars Pro Johnny Lodden was one of those playing yesterday, and he survived to come back to tomorrow's Day 2 with his 20,000 starting stack intact.

simrugg.jpgTeam PokerStars: Italy's Simone Ruggeri

Also through is Team PokerStars: Italy player Simone Ruggeri, and Stefano Puccilli, who won the debut PokerStars IPT event in San Remo. But one of the early casualties was Dutchman Constant Rijkenberg, winner of the EPT San Remo event in April. In total, 86 players survived the day.

Today's Day 1B will be a tough one, with the likes of Team PokerStars Pros Dario Minieri - keen to do some damage on his home turf - and Marcel Luske stalking the field.

rijkenpuccilli.jpgConstant Rijkenberg and Stefano Puccilli

You can follow all the action over on our Italian blog, which will carry more pictures to at least give you a flavor of proceedings even if you can't understand a word of Italian. For more on the IPT, take a look at the PokerStars IPT site.


APPT: Festival in the East

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

appt_thumb_promo.jpgMy, they grow up so fast.

Just a few short years ago, the Asia Pacific Poker Tour was a smattering of events in the Far East, a short series of tournaments that looked to test the poker waters in that part of the world. Today, even we folks in the West are looking at the schedules and saying, "Wow, how can I get over there for that?"

We've just had a peek at the schedule for the kickoff of the APPT's third season in Macau, and it rivals the rundown for just about any series we have ever seen. There's little question why.

The Season 1 APPT Macau main event drew more than 300 players. Just a year later, more than 200 new players showed up to build a field of 538. It was a record then, and one that could very well be beaten this year.

jeffrey-record.jpgAPPT president Jeffrey Haas announces the broken record in 2008

Now, we're looking at an APPT schedule that kicks off in just a little more than two weeks and will run for 15 straight days. During that time, we're going to see 20 (count'em 20!) poker tournaments with buy-ins for every bankroll. Short-handed events, knockout tournaments, charity events, and high roller tourneys are all over the schedule. That's not to mention to potentially record-breaking main event that kicks off on August 25th.

If you're anything like us, you're now thinking, "Well, surely I can find some way to get myself over there." Fortunately for you, PokerStars is always running APPT qualifiers. Just click on EVENTS and APPT in the tournament lobby.

In the meantime, see APPT.com for more details or check out this schedule below (and put in a good word for us...and maybe one of us will see you there!)


Saturday August 15th

14:15 - Satellite to 100K Guarantee HKD$550

18:00 - No Limit Holdem HKD$2,500 HKD ($100,000 Guaranteed Prize Pool)

Sunday August 16th


14:15 - No Limit Holdem w/ Rebuys HKD$500 (HKD$20,000 Guaranteed Prize Pool)

17:00 - Satellite Main Event Phase 2 HKD$900

19:00 - Satellite Main Event Phase 3 HKD$4,200

Monday August 17th


12:15 - Satellite Main Event Phase 2 HKD$900

14:15 - No Limit Holdem HKD$1,000

Tuesday August 18th

12:15 - Satellite Main Event Phase 2 HKD$900

14:15 - No Limit Holdem HKD$1,500

Wednesday August 19th

12:15 - Satellite Main Event Phase 2 HKD$900

14:15 - Knock-Out Bounty No Limit Holdem HKD$2,000 (HKD$500 cash for every player you eliminate)

18:00 - Satellite Main Event Phase 3 HKD$4,200


Thursday August 20th

14:15 - Free to Enter Mega Satellite w/ HKD$500 Rebuys HKD$0 (1 APPT Macau MAIN EVENT SEAT GUARANTEED - Entries open at 10am)

18:00 - APPT Macau Charity Event w/ max 2 Rebuys HKD$1,000 (HKD$50,000 added value prizes)


Friday August 21th

14:15 - No Limit Holdem Deep Stack HKD$1,500

18:00 - Satellite Main Event Phase 3 HKD$4,200

Saturday August 22th

12:15 - Mega Satellite to 10k HKD$2,150

15:30 - No Limit Holdem Day 1 HKD$10,000 (HKD$500,000 GUARANTEED Prize Pool)

18:00 - Satellite Main Event Phase 3 HKD$4,200


Sunday August 23th

12:15 - No Limit Holdem Day 2

14:15 - Terrence Chan Limit Hold'em 6 Handed HKD$2,500

18:00 - Satellite Main Event Phase 3 HKD$4,200

Monday August 24th

12:15 - Satellite Main Event Phase 3 HKD$4,200

14:15 - Turbo Shoot-out No Limit Holdem HKD$1,500

16:30 - Satellite Main Event Phase 3 HKD$4,200

21:00 - APPT Macau Welcome Party

Tuesday August 25th

12:15 - APPT Macau Main Event Day 1 Flight 1 HKD$40,000

15:00 - No Limit Holdem HKD$4,000


Wednesday August 26th

12:15 - APPT Macau Main Event Day 1 Flight 2 HKD$40,000

15:00 - No Limit Holdem 7-Handed Event HKD$5,000

18:00 - Last Chance Mega Satellite to Main Event HKD$4,200


Thursday August 27th

12:15 - APPT Macau Main Event Day 1 Flight 3 HKD$40,000

16:00 - Knock-Out Bounty No Limit Holdem HKD$4,000 (HKD$1,000 cash for every player you eliminate)

18:00 - Ladies Event No Limit Holdem HKD$1,500


Friday August 28th

12:15 - APPT Macau Main Event Day 2

15:00 - No Limit Holdem Teams Event HKD$5,000

18:00 - Mega Satellite to High Roller Event HKD$9,400


Saturday August 29th

12:15 - APPT Macau Main Event Day 3

14:15 - APPT Macau High Rollers Event Day 1 HKD$88,800

15:00 - No Limit Holdem HKD$2,000

18:00 - Satellite to APPT Seoul w/ Rebuys HKD$500


Sunday August 30th

12:15 - APPT Macau Main Event Final Table

13:00 - APPT Macau High Rollers Event Day 2

14:15 - No Limit Holdem w/ Rebuys HKD$1,000

18:00 - Mega Satellite to APPT Seoul HKD$4,000


Scene set for PokerStars IPT Venice

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

It's been known as the City of Bridges, the City of Water, and even the City of Light. Now Venice, for a few days at least, can be called the City of Poker, as the PokerStars Italian Poker Tour begins the second leg of its debut season.

The first IPT event in San Remo was a huge hit, with banker Stefano Puccilli walking off with the first prize of €120,000 after a punishing 14-hour final table. Well over 100 players will head to beautiful Venice to play today's (Thursday) and tomorrow's day one flights, with a day 2 on Saturday and the final on Sunday.

stefanopucc.jpgStefano Puccilli, winner of IPT San Remo

While some will be coughing up the €2,000 + 200 to play at Venice's Casino Ca'Vendramin, many more players have secured their seats by qualifying on PokerStars.

They'll be up against some of the biggest names in the game, including Team PokerStars Pros Dario Minieri, Marcel Luske, Johnny Lodden, Vanessa Rousso and Chad Brown. Also around the felt will be members of Team PokerStars: Italy - Filippo Candio, Simone Ruggeri , Pierpaolo Fabretti, Nicola Fedeli and Elena Ichim.

We'll put up a post at the end of each day here, but our Italian blog will be following all the action and posting chip counts throughout the event. The words may be foreign to you, but you'll get a tremendous flavor of a poker event staged the Italian way. By that I mean it will be loud, excitable, and, well, just plain fun!

If you'd like to find out more, please keep an eye on our IPT website, available here in English, and over here in Italian.

Ciao!


2009 WCOOP: Extreme satellites!

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

wcoop-extreme-thumb.jpgSometime in the mid-90s, I was sitting in a bar in Colorado after a long day falling down a mountain. On the TV above the bar, men were jumping out of helicopters and then throwing themselves over snow-packed summits with abandon.They called it Extreme Skiing. I was intrigued. Who were these men? How did they live? Why did my back hurt so much?

What I'm about to offer you is, hopefully, just as exciting, but without the risk of a compound fracture and gushing head wound.

See, you might have heard about this thing PokerStars does called the World Championship of Online Poker. PokerStars guarantees $40,000,000 (that's 40 million bucks for the zero counting impaired) over 45 different poker events. Over 18 days in September, we're going to see the online poker equivalent of some extreme skiing and we don't have to leave the comfort of our easy chair (and we can sit around in our underwear!).

You can read all about it, see a schedule, and get all excited over at the PokerStars WCOOP page. In the meantime, there might be some of you out there who aren't necessarily ready to throw your bankroll off a cliff and see what happens. Fortunately, PokerStars has come up with a solution. Say it with me...

Extreme satellites!

Okay, I'll be honest. I didn't know what Extreme Satellites were when I heard the term, either. I imagined something like single table qualifiers using scorpions instead of chips or using Chuck Manson as a dealer.

Instead, starting next week (August 4th to be exact), PokerStars is going to run 12 days of hard core qualifiers. Two or three times a day, for as little as $7.50, you're going to be able to play in satellites in which (and this is the extreme part) PokerStars is adding between 50 and 100 seats per event.

Wha?

Yeah, like the Spanish Inquisition, I didn't expect it, either.

So get ready for some pretty significant overlays and a chance to play in poker's most extreme online poker series. For a complete schedule of these qualifiers, see the PokerStars WCOOP Extreme Satellites web page.

If you need a little inspiration to get yourself going, here's a look at the 2008 Main Event highlight show.


Watch WCOOP Highlights: $5,200 Main Event on PokerStars.tv


In the meantime, go get extreme. We dare you.


Sunday Million Online Poker Show (7-26-09)

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

The worst possible river with Chad Brown

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

wsop2009_thn.gifChad Brown's best chance at a WSOP bracelet in 2009 came in the $10,000 Limit Hold'em championship. A tough limit hold'em player in his own right, Brown tore through the field and looked good for the victory. And then there was the worst possible river you could imagine. In this final installment from the 2009 WSOP, Chad Brown leads us to that moment.


by Chad Brown

The WSOP limit hold'em championship had all the best limit hold'em players in the world. I was playing very well on Day 1 and knew that there could be no mistakes with this tough competition. I made it through Day 1 with an above average chip stack and finished Day 2 in the money. I came back on Day 3 with the final table in sight.

With around 16 players left, there was a key hand that I did not play. There was a raise by a loose player in early position and Howard Lederer re-raised. It was folded to me in the small blind. I had pocket nines and I folded. Howard was heads up with the loose player and the flop came down with a 9-high board with two spades. I thought, wow, I would have flopped top set! But I live by the philosophy of not playing results. I know laying down the nines in this spot was the right decision. The turn and the river put up running spades and Howard won the hand with the nut flush, as he was holding two aces in his hand. If I would have played this hand, I would have left myself very short and probably would not have made the final table.

So, I make it to the final table and, with the exception of one player, everyone is world class at limit hold'em. I recognized that to win this bracelet, I would have to play my very best and catch some breaks. I think there were six players left when we saw the pot of the night.

There was a raise and a re-raise and the action moved to Daniel Alaei. Daniel was one of the chip leaders to start this hand and he cold called two bets on the button. The re-raiser, Pat Pezzin, plays a style very similar to Lederer. The big blind re-raised and Pat capped it. Daniel had pocket nines and, because of all the money in the pot, he had to play after the flop came up 5-6-8. He knew he was behind, but he had six likely outs to take the lead. The flop and the turn were capped. Daniel missed on the river and was able to lay it down. Pat, of course, had the rockets and won a massive pot. It crippled Daniel in the process. I felt he was one of the tougher players at the table. I'm sure Daniel realized it was a mistake to call Pat's re-raise under these circumstances, but it's that kind of mistake that can make the difference.

chad-brown-holdem.jpg

With three players remaining, I was facing Pat and Greg Mueller. I had won a bunch of small pots and had a big chip lead. Pat was the short stack, but was still okay. This tournament had a great structure and gave us a lot of play. Then came the hand of the tournament for me.

Pat had raised on the button and I called from the small blind with [Ad][2d]. Greg called in the big blind. The flop came queen-high with two diamonds and we all checked. The turn put up a seven and I bet. Greg raised and Pat mucked. I made the call drawing to the ace high flush, but I actually thought my ace might be good. I have played a lot with Greg and know he is capable of making a play there with a draw. Bingo, the [4d] fell on the river. If I won this pot, I'd have about 90% of the chips in play and am almost certain to win my first bracelet. I checked thinking that Greg would bet if he missed a straight draw and he could have hit a smaller flush. He bet just as planned. I raised, he re-raised, I re-raised and he re-raised. I stopped and look at the board. The [3d][5d] made a straight flush. I said aloud, "I can't believe you made a straight flush."

I should have mucked, but I paid off with the hope, not that he would be bluffing, but that there was a remote chance he misread his cards. That was the only hope there was, but he did indeed have the straight flush. I was crushed. That was the bracelet.

It wasn't over for me. I was still chip average, but I lost every hand after that, and in all of them--with the exception of the last hand--I had the best of it on the flop and would get sucked out on the turn or river. I finished in a disappointing third place, but to be honest, I was very proud of the way I played and thought I gave myself the best chance to win. Greg went on to victory and followed that up with yet another bracelet. They were his first and second bracelets and were well overdue.


Raymer, Haxton to hit ESPN tonight

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

wsop2009_thn.gifIt sort of feels like we just left the Amazon Room. We can still smell the burgers from the Poker Kitchen, see the thousands of players, and hear the countless bad beat stories. It feels like yesterday (instead of a couple of weeks ago).

Well, now it's time to go back.

If you live somewhere you can pick up ESPN, you'll be happy to know coverage of the $40,000 WSOP Anniversary tournament kicks off tonight. If you're a faithful reader (and if you're not, shame on you), you'll remember that PokerStars' own Greg Raymer and Isaac Haxton happened to be sitting at the final table of that event.

raymhaxtfin-thumb-300x450-71370.jpg


Now, we're all too aware that there are people out there who like to go in fresh. They avoid any internet coverage of the WSOP, stay as far from Vegas as they can, don't read Twitter, and lock themselves in a closet from June until late July. That's to say, we understand you don't want us to spoil this one for you.

If you'd like to read along as you watch tonight, we have full coverage. Pop along here, scroll down and enjoy.

Otherwise, just watch tonight and enjoy. Here's a preview from ESPN.


Chad Brown escorts Norm Chad to the money

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

wsop2009_thn.gifChad Brown has seen a lot of things in poker, and he is one of few people to ever see the ultra-rare occurrence of ESPN's Norman Chad making the money at a WSOP event.This week we're looking at some of Brown's experience's at this year's WSOP and Chad has been kind enough to write a few words for us about seeing the great white whale of WSOP money finishes.

by Chad Brown

Stud-8 tourneys are among the easiest to win. I already have a runner up finish in the same event at the WSOP and I actually won the Stud-8 event at the Bellagio Cup a few years back.

On the bubble in this year's World Series, I had well above chip average, so making the money wasn't a problem. ESPN's Norman Chad who has never cashed in a WSOP event was one of the very short stacks battling for his first-ever wsop cash. It took a while but he made it. We redrew and I got Norm at my table with 1,000 in chips. The antes were 200 with a 200 bring in. There was no money increase unless you moved up another ten spots, so Norm would have to be going all in soon. On the next hand Norm had an ace showing and the first three players mucked to him. But wait! Norm folded. What? Norm folded? Does he have a last longer with another short stack? I saw him at the WSOP Main Event and needled him about it. Lon was there and we had a good laugh. I think he must have been in shock that he finally cashed.

chad-brown-stud.jpg

It was onto another final table for me. This time it is a very easy table. I had an above average chip stack. Three key hands determined how my final table turned out. In two hands I had a low draw, straight, and flush draw with a pair going to the river. The two other players in the hand were going high. Not only didn't I scoop, but didn't hit my low either. The third key hand was similar. The other players were going high. I made a wheel on sixth, but one of the players made a flush on the river and I only got half. I finished in fourth place and that was that.

Once again I was very happy with my play and did all I could do to win it.

That's poker.